Upon reading the reviews of the Humane AI Pin, one cannot help but question the true potential of this new AI wearable. The author, Allison Johnson, delves into her own experiment of trying to create a similar AI gadget using a combination of a midrange Android phone and various other accessories. However, her attempt highlights the limitations and challenges of developing functional AI wearables that can seamlessly integrate into daily life.
Johnson’s initial prototype involved clamping a Motorola Razr Plus to the neckline of her shirt, with the intention of using the phone as an AI gadget. Despite her efforts to download Gemini and set it as the default assistant, she quickly realized the shortcomings of using a folding phone for this purpose. The challenges of accessing the voice assistant from the cover screen and the limitations of operating Google Lens on a flip phone exposed the practical difficulties of using traditional smartphones as AI wearables.
Exploring Alternatives
Undeterred by the limitations of her first prototype, Johnson proceeded to experiment with other devices, such as running ChatGPT in conversation mode on the cover screen of the Razr flip phone. However, the constant listening capability of the app proved impractical for everyday use. This led her to abandon the foldable concept in favor of a Pixel 8 and a Pixel Watch 2 setup, with Gemini as the default assistant. Despite some success in utilizing wireless earbuds for hands-free interaction with the AI assistant, Johnson’s experiment highlighted the challenges of achieving seamless connectivity and integration across multiple devices.
The Implications for Future AI Wearables
While Johnson’s experiment may have been a playful exploration of DIY AI wearables, it raises important questions about the future of such devices. The author’s skepticism towards standalone AI gadgets and her preference for integrating AI capabilities into existing devices like phones and earbuds reflect a broader trend in consumer technology. The convenience and ubiquity of smartphones, coupled with the growing popularity of wearable earbuds, suggest that the future of AI wearables may lie in enhancing the functionality of these existing devices.
Johnson’s emphasis on the practicality and user acceptance of AI wearables underscores the importance of addressing the “doofy factor” in wearable technology. The author’s comparison of the Humane AI Pin to wearing earbuds throughout the day highlights the need for AI gadgets to seamlessly integrate into daily routines and social norms. The shift towards leveraging the processing power and connectivity features of smartphones for AI applications points to a pragmatic approach to developing wearable technology that is both functional and fashionable.
Johnson’s experiment with DIY AI wearables sheds light on the challenges and opportunities facing the future of wearable technology. While there may be room for dedicated AI hardware in the market, the increasing convergence of AI capabilities with smartphones and other everyday devices suggests that the future of AI wearables may be closer than we think. By leveraging existing technologies and improving integration and user experience, the next generation of AI wearables could revolutionize how we interact with technology in our daily lives.
Leave a Reply