Last year, the International Trade Commission made the controversial decision to ban the sales of Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2 due to alleged infringement of medical device-maker Masimo’s pulse oximetry patents. This decision sparked a legal battle between Apple and Masimo, with Apple recently filing an appeal to the Federal Circuit. The appeal brief is a whopping 916 pages long and raises important questions about the jurisdiction of the ITC and the validity of Masimo’s claims.
In its appeal, Apple argues that Masimo did not have a legitimate case at the time the complaint was filed with the ITC. Apple points out that Masimo was primarily known for clinical pulse oximeters and did not even have a smartwatch on the market when the complaint was made. Masimo’s W1 smartwatch, the device in question, was only launched in 2022, a year after the complaint was filed. Additionally, Apple claims that Masimo only provided CAD drawings as evidence, which may not meet the criteria of “articles” under the ITC’s jurisdiction.
Concerns Over Precedent
Apple’s appeal also raises concerns about the potential consequences of upholding the ITC’s decision. Apple argues that if Masimo’s case is affirmed, it could set a precedent that would allow other companies to use similar tactics to ban products. Apple is worried that companies with no actual domestic industry but possessing CAD software and creative pleading skills could exploit the ITC’s trade forum for their benefit. This could open the floodgates for more disputes and import bans based on questionable grounds.
The Apple Watch ban controversy is not an isolated case. Another medical tech company, AliveCor, has also turned to the ITC to ban Apple Watches, alleging infringement of its EKG technology. The ITC ruled in favor of AliveCor and issued an import ban on Apple Watches. However, AliveCor is currently appealing a ruling by the Patent Trial and Appeals Board that deems its technology unpatentable. This ongoing legal battle highlights the complexities and uncertainties of intellectual property disputes in the tech industry.
The Apple Watch ban controversy shines a spotlight on the challenges and intricacies of intellectual property law in the tech industry. The outcome of Apple’s appeal to the Federal Circuit could have far-reaching implications for future disputes and import bans. As the legal battle continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the courts will interpret the conflicting arguments presented by Apple and Masimo. One thing is certain: the tech industry is no stranger to legal battles, and the Apple Watch ban controversy is just the latest chapter in a long saga of intellectual property disputes.
Leave a Reply